|
BROWSE THE
SITE:
[Home] [About Heritage] [Heritage Coffee Canada] [Vending & OCS] [Specialty Coffee] [Food Service] [Green Coffee Buyers] [Stuart Daw Reports] [Business Resources] [Coffee Humor] [Helpful Links] [A Few Coffee Facts]
Sales
800-791-7811
Fax: 519-668-1384
97 Bessemer Rd., #1
London, ON N6E 1P9
Contact Us

| |
VENDING & OCS ARTICLES BY STUART DAW:
[Coffee, Fat, Sugar and Happiness] [Coffee or Wine] [Ethics, Economics and Fair Trade] [Philosophy and Trade Assns] [Pods - A Bursting Bubble] [Private Label vs National Brands] [Single Cup Brewers and OCS] [Single Cup Horse Race] [Single Cup - What Should We Do Now?] [The Continuum to Contentment] [There's a Whole Lotta Changes] [Vend/OCS Selling] [Who Knows What a Cup of Coffee Is?] [Brew Cups and Pods]
Single Cup -
What Should We Do Now?
Copyright 2005 Stuart Daw
The single cup issue, so much the topic of conversation in coffee service and
vending these days, was bound to dominate the recent NBPA show in Atlantic City.
And so it did. Asked to deliver the keynote speech at the opening luncheon, I
tried to avoid venturing opinions in favor of tossing out questions, the answers
to which, coming from our peers, might serve as a guide to those operators
tormented by the prospect of rapid change.
Viewing the past history of coffee service, buyer preferences have always hung
in the balance between three main issues: quality, convenience, and price. Every
innovation is an attempt to improve one, two, or all three. Where do the new
cups and pods stand with respect to these things?
Most people at the show obviously knew the business very well, and many also
have had experience with one or more types of single cup units. But on the
principle that no one can be omniscient and know everything, asking enough of
the right questions can often elicit some important new insights. Here is a
rundown of those questions I put to the audience at the convention.
First, does an operator not yet in cups or pods have to delve in immediately to
avoid being left behind, or would a period of observation and caution be wise?
After all, one or two machines are likely to become dominant, and do we want to
run the risk of warehouses full of obsolete equipment?
Are pods somewhat of a fad, and not likely to make the deep
inroads that most are predicting today?
Should we wait until pod and holder sizes have finally been standardized?
In the quality/convenience/price issue, where do pods and cups stand relative to
batch brew? They are much more expensive by the cup, and hardly much handier,
but they do offer wider choices. Their main value likely has to rest in their
consistency (As a personal aside, don’t underestimate consistency as a virtue to
customers. As one cynical old roaster put it to me many years ago in rather
vulgar terms, “It’s okay to sell ----, as long as you keep it consistent.” And
observing national brand dominance in the retail business, the old guy might
have been justified in saying, “I rest my case.”).
The batch brew cycle can better ensure a full extraction of the
coffee than the pod or cup, where a much greater degree of grind precision is
required. But the pod brew never sits around. It’s already in the drinking cup,
so can’t become stale. Batch brew glass decanters were a very poor method of
holding brewed coffee. The air-pots that supplanted them are far better, but on
one condition: they must be kept clean. Many are not, giving us the taste of
yesterday’s or last week’s coffee as an unwanted addition to today’s. And fresh
coffee even in a clean air-pot has a breakdown curve, though of course much
slower than in a glass decanter.
Many single cup advocates are pushing what they call “The Coffee
House Effect” that pods and cups may engender in the business office. They are
referring to the multiple choices offered more easily by single cup. But that
effect also has much to do with aroma, the Starbuckian ambiance one gets on
entering a coffee house. Aroma of coffee is what I call “coffee foreplay,
leading to the main event, which is drinking it.” If that is what we want, batch
brew imparts a far better aroma in the office, strictly as a function of the
amount of floral stimulation hitting the olfactory nerves (That is assuming a
high quality coffee; low grade coffee might have the opposite effect).
Has anyone done a competitive trial to determine customer
preference of pods Vs cups Vs flexible pods, regardless of price?
Out of all pod installations, what percentage of batch brewers
and even grinders will remain on location? Early indications are that once a
decision is made in any office, it will be one or the other, and locations may
not be shared after all. One reason may be that specific times for office coffee
breaks with a rush of people to the coffee area are a thing of the past, so
lineups waiting for single cup coffee are not a problem. The exception may be
with offices holding large meetings and not wanting to go through the waiting
time needed for individualized servings.
But where an office does consider pods and/or cups too slow for a
fast employee coffee break, will that mean multiple machines? And speaking of
machines, will leasing these units become obsolete?
Will automatic ejection of pods be imperative, and will the additional cost be
justified?
Will packaging materials have to be biodegradable?
Will operators know how to set prices to ensure profitability? At one table
before the NBPA luncheon, an experienced operator held that small accounts with
large percentage markups are preferable to large accounts with low markups as a
way to begin placing pod machines (See my article on
Transactional Cost Analysis).
How service-free will the various types and makes of machines be, relative to
each other?
What about the question of sanitation with respect to multiple handlers of pods
and pod holders?
How far below cups will pods prices have to be to swing the office buyer their
way?
Have any definitive tests been done to assess customer preference between the
various applications; pods, cups, or soft plastic pods (Flavia), regardless of
price?
Is there a coin op issue in single cup?
Will the advent of pods in serious numbers persuade cup suppliers to slash
prices, making pod installations harder to locate and to hold?
In the old battle between private label and national brands, which will win out?
Will it be the same result as we found with batch brew machines? And will
operators make the same mistake as many did in batch brew, pricing the lower
quality national brand above their own private label?
Pods will be very easy to demo. Will sales people with pockets full of
standardized pods be roaming the streets ducking in and out of offices to brew
on whatever machines are being used?
What about the cross fertilization of flavors brewing through the
same holder?
Will over-all coffee quality suffer when every operator has access to various
types of machines? When no one company can control the product, and as the
market matures, will serious price cutting begin?
Will strength variation come from the usual elongation of extraction times, or
by bypassing water into a standardized, strongly brewed cup?
What about “stealability?” Are pods and cups easy to take home?
While this may seem to be a plus to the unethical operator, it’s bound to be a
negative in the long run. Some years ago an operator in Oxnard, California,
working out of a house trailer and on seeing a 20 ounce complementary tin of
iced tea that I handed him, told me he would never handle a product that
couldn’t be stolen. He said that one third of all coffee service coffee was
spirited away in men’s suit pockets, lady’s purses, or by other means (He went
bankrupt sometime later).
Will all operators have to go to pre-write, as vans will be hard put to stock
the plethora of product codes involved in single cup? And by the same token,
will customers be ticked off by the space required to store the multiplicity of
boxes, and will staleness be a problem when the whim buyer orders something,
only one pod or cup of which gets consumed?
Will unwrapped bulk pods in one over-wrap run too big a risk of staleness?
When a business manager asks his accountant to run down the
expense categories on his income statement, looking for possible candidates for
elimination, will the accountant’s eyes bulge out as they did in days of yore at
the money flowing out for coffee? Or has the coffee break as an institution
become so important that no manager would dare remove it? As one operator at the
NBPA show said, “The coffee break is maybe only 10% of the health care expense,
so why cut it?” Would anyone dare suggest that, given coffee’s positive health
effects, maybe the whole health care plan could be dumped in favor of the
coffee?
All kidding aside, single cup is firmly planted in the coffee
service world. Only the choice of direction remains. As Sixth Century BC Greek
philosopher Heraclitus said in two aphorisms: “Everything flows; nothing
abides,” and, “Nothing is. Everything is becoming.” In other words, for old
Heraclitus as for us in the coffee business, change is inevitable. May we face
it with confidence.
View the entire archives of Stuart Daw
articles going back to the 1980's
Stuart Daw's Article Archives
|